Close

Articles Posted in Uncategorized

Updated:

Sherman, Texas Probation Revocation Attorney: The Right to a Speedy Hearing (Part 1)

A Defendant formally accused of violating probation also has the right to a speedy revocation hearing. In addition to statutory provisions addressing timeliness in motions to revoke, the Court of Criminal Appeals has historically recognized two sources of law which provide for the right to a speedy revocation hearing: (1)…

Updated:

Sherman, Texas Criminal Trial Attorney: The Right to A Speedy Trial in Texas (Part 3)

The reasons for the delay of a trial are important under the second prong, and the State will be required to put forward their reasons at a dismissal hearing.  Right now, blood and drug results from the State laboratory are taking six months or so to process.   A person sitting…

Updated:

Sherman, Texas Criminal Trial Attorney: The Right to A Speedy Trial in Texas (Part 2)

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals analyzes both speedy trial and speedy revocation motion matters under the factors set forth by the United States Supreme Court in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (1972). These factors include: (1) the length of the delay, (2) the reasons for the delay, (3)…

Updated:

Sherman, Texas Criminal Trial Attorney: The Right to A Speedy Trial in Texas (Part 1)

Going back to the Constitution of the United States, American citizens are guaranteed a speedy and public trial.   The public part is why a Court cannot bar you from entering to watch a trial unless you are a witness, but the speedy part has been developed over the years.  I…

Updated:

Yes, you can aid and abet a federal conspiracy in the Fifth Circuit (Part Two)

Rear view of police detective standing and looking at the paper in front of the wall with map, pictures and sticky notes at office The Fifth Circuit in Cowart and sister Courts of Appeals note that conspiracy is a distinct offense from that of aiding and abetting, and involves the…

Updated:

Drugs on a Plane: Sherman Plano Federal Court International Jurisdiction (Part Three)

In Morrison v. National Australia Bank, 561 U.S. 247 (2010), the Supreme Court applied the presumption against extraterritoriality to securities fraud statutes. Again in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, 133 S.Ct. 1659 (2013), the Supreme Court applied the presumption and held the plaintiff lacked extraterritorial jurisdiction under the Alien Tort…

Contact Us